heartbeatRadar

← YouTube

Original öffnen ↗
@alexhormoziAlex Hormozi·US·4,5 Mio. Follower

Why AI won't make you rich in 2026

Hook: „Why AI won't make you rich in 2026 / In this video, I'm going to make a case against AI, and more specifically, why more people are not making money despite using AI a lot“

Video·9:41 min·veröffentlicht 19.07.26 (vor 2 Monaten)·erfasst 02.09.26
2,8×Faktor (Views / Median 115.088, n=32)
316.639Views
13.542Likes
608Kommentare
Talking HeadRant / PolarisierungHook: these polarisierend3-10minProduktion: mittelCTA: link bioKonfidenz mittel

Warum es zieht

Der Post lief mit Faktor 2,75x deutlich über dem Median des Kanals. Die polarisierende These gegen den AI-Hype im Titel und Thumbnail (ignore the hype) widerspricht der aktuellen Erwartungshaltung und könnte dadurch Aufmerksamkeit erzeugen. Talking Head im rohen Setting mit direkter Geste zur Kamera unterstützt eine persönliche, glaubwürdige Ansprache. Die Länge von knapp 10 Minuten und die freie, unvorbereitete Sprechweise (vom Sprecher selbst als impromptu bezeichnet) deuten auf ein Format hin, das auf Meinung statt auf Produktion setzt.

Belege
  • Ausreißer-Faktor 2,75x gegenüber Kanal-Median
  • Thumbnail mit Text-Overlay ignore the hype und direkter Blickkontakt
  • Titel als polarisierende These gegen aktuellen AI-Trend formuliert
  • Dauer 581s, Talking Head ohne sichtbare B-Roll im Thumbnail
  • Sprecher nennt eigenes Format selbst impromptu style im Transkript
Hook

„Why AI won't make you rich in 2026 / In this video, I'm going to make a case against AI, and more specifically, why more people are not making money despite using AI a lot“

Titel-/Hook-Muster

Warum [Trend] dich NICHT [erwünschtes Ergebnis] bringt

Für Stefan / Heartbeat

Ein RAW Talk Format, in dem Stefan Graf eine verbreitete Meinung im Markt (z.B. AI-Hype oder Skalierungsmythen) aktiv hinterfragt, könnte ähnlich funktionieren, weil die polarisierende These gegen den Strom Aufmerksamkeit erzeugt.

Thema

AI Hype und Leverage in Business

Sichtbar
  • eine Person im Talking Head Setup
  • legere Wohnzimmer- oder Büroumgebung
  • Text-Overlay ignore the hype im Thumbnail
  • Gestikulation mit beiden Händen zur Kamera
  • Buch oder Objekt im Hintergrund sichtbar
  • kein erkennbares Untertitel-Overlay im Thumbnail
aihypeleveragebusinessmeinungskalierung

Thumbnail-Stil: text dominant

Analyse 02.09., 09:32 · claude-sonnet-5

Verlauf

MessungAlterViewsLikesKomm.Label
02.09., 09:3045.2 d316.63913.542608t0

t0 = erste Erfassung, t7 = etwa 7 Tage, t28 = etwa 28 Tage nach Veröffentlichung.

Notiz

Beschreibung

Download your free scaling roadmap here: http://www.acquisition.com/roadmap If you’re new to my channel, my name is Alex Hormozi. I’m the founder and managing partner of Acquisition.com. It’s a family office, which is just a formal way of saying we invest our own money into companies. Our 10 portfolio companies bring in over $250,000,000+ per year. Our ownership stake varies between 20% and 100% of them. Given this is a YT channel, and anyone can claim anything, I’ll give you some stuff you can google to verify below. How I got here… 21: Graduated Vanderbilt in 3 years Magna Cum Laude, and took a fancy consulting job. 23 yrs old: Left my fancy consulting job to start a business (a gym). 24 yrs old: Opened 5 gym locations. 26 yrs old: Closed down 6th gym. Lost everything. 26 yrs old: Got back to launching gyms (launched 33). Then, lost everything for a 2nd time. 26 yrs old: In desperation, started licensing model as a hail mary. It worked. 27 yrs old: "Gym Launch" does $3M profit the next 6 months. Then $17M profit next 12 months. 28 yrs old: Started Prestige Labs. $20M the first year. 29 yrs old: Launched ALAN, a software company for agencies to work leads for customers. Scaled to $1.7mmo within 6 months. 31 yrs old: Sold 75% of UseAlan to a strategic buyer in an all stock deal. 31 yrs old: Sold 66% of Gym Launch & Prestige Labs at $46.2M valuation in all-cash deal to American Pacific Group. (you can google it) 31 yrs old: Started our family office Acquisition.com. We invest and scale companies using the $42M in distributions we had taken + the cash from the $46.2M exit. 32 yrs old: Started making free content showing how we grow companies to make real business education accessible to everyone (and) to attract business owners to invest or scale their businesses. 34 yrs old: I became co-owner of https://Skool.com, which is a platform for people to build communities online, making a living doing what they love, with people like them. 36 yrs old: I did a $106M book launch selling 3.6M copies of my $100M Money Models book, in 72 hours, breaking the Guinness world record for the fastest selling non-fiction book of all time. Today: Our portfolio now does $200M/yr between 10 companies. The largest doing $100M/yr the smallest doing $5M per year. Our ownership varies between 20% and 100% ownership of the companies. Many of them we invested in early and helped grow (which is how we make our money - not youtube videos). To all the gladiators in the arena, we’re all in the middle of writing our own stories. The worse the monsters, the more epic the story. You either get an epic outcome or an epic story. Both mean you win. Keep crushing. May your desires be greater than your obstacles. Never quit, Alex DISCLOSURE Information shared here is for educational purposes only. Individuals and business owners should evaluate their own business strategies, and identify any potential risks. The information shared here is not a guarantee of success. Your results may vary. Copyright © 2026.

Transkript (apify, 2025 Wörter)

anzeigen
In this video, I'm going to make a case against AI, and more specifically, why more people are not making money despite using AI a lot and token maxing and vibe coding and making all these apps and all that stuff. And so, the big misconception, I think, around AI is that AI somehow canceled every other form of leverage. And if you're new to the channel, leverage just means the difference in what you put in and what you get out. If you have a lot of leverage, you put a little bit in, you get a lot out. If you have low leverage, then you put a lot in, you get a little bit out. So, that, you know, AI introduces high leverage, which is great. But, the thing is is that there's a lot of things [snorts] that create leverage. And so, this whole misconception around like, "Oh, we must only use AI in order to succeed." Um taken differently, businesses right now who are using AI and individuals who are using AI and they're seeing their token bills go up are somehow not making more money. And so, what I find kind of interesting is a couple things. So, number one, when I look at our business, we are uh we now have had a another kind of step increase in our revenue, um but it's not because of AI. That's the thing. It's not because of AI. If AI didn't exist, we still would have had the increase. And so, it's not like a direct line there. Um the second kind of proof point that I think is more interesting around this, and I'll then I'll give you some tactics, um is that I talked to a number of uh my wealthiest, oldest friends uh over the last week or two, and I I said, "Listen, I know you need to have public appearances." So, I said, "Of course, we're here. We're all super AI advocates because you have to do that." Um but, I said, "How much are you actually using AI every day?" And like, they kind of like look around and they're like, "Dude, I'm not using AI." And I was like, "Well, your teams aren't." He's like, "Oh, yeah, of course, you know, of course, you know, they're like, "Of course, our teams are using it." And then I'm bringing people in and we're training the team up and all that kind of stuff. And I was like, "But, you're not using it." And they're like, "No. No, I'm not." And I was like, "So, that's very interesting to me." And so, this is the thought that I I kind of want to challenge you with and then I'll leave some tactics at the end. Which is there are a lot of forms of leverage. And many forms of leverage are multiplicative. So, for example, capital still has tremendous leverage. [clears throat] AI coming in didn't somehow erase the leverage that capital uses. If you are in media and you make a video like this and thousands of people see it or millions of people see it, that is tremendous leverage, right? AI doesn't erase that. Um and when you multiply some of these together, let's say you have capital and you have media and and maybe you have teams, right? People still create leverage for other people. Um I do find it ironic that like these the frontier labs that have all this AI still have thousands of employees and so it's just like kind of interesting as a as a counterpoint of like, well, people are still being, you know, needed and useful. Um but the thought of it is this is that I'm seeing so many business owners trying to AI-max and their because their capacity to work has increased using AI, they are now doing things they otherwise would not have done if they didn't have AI. But the thing is, those things that they otherwise wouldn't have done were lower priorities. And so now they're doing things that were less important faster and automated. Great. Not great. It doesn't matter is my point. Um and so one of the interesting things about not having AI is that it forces you to prioritize better. It forces you to focus on the things that are going to move the needle in the business. And I'm not seeing with an exclusion of like just a handful of exceptions, um most AI use cases that I've seen um are not actually making the business a ton more money. I think that having, you know, way more ad creative, I think for sure is helpful from from an from an advertising perspective. Um we have an AI sales rep, which has been helpful. But the thing is it's like the AI sales rep is great, but like I also know how to build sales teams. So it's not like this You know what I'm saying? Like it's like it's it's more efficient, you know, and it scales, but it's it's typically not the limiter of the business. And this is my point is that the constraint of the business many business constraints at least to this at this point are not still as perfectly solvable with AI. And if they were, then everybody be making a ton more money. This is kind of like the crux of this, which is Let me give you some other examples of leverage that people are just not employing that you don't need any tech expertise to do. If you have a one-on-one business, you can go to one-on, you know, one to one to many. It's like that would create a lot of leverage. Even one to small group. And so if you want one-on-one to one-on-10, you have 10x leverage. Like just like that with that one decision, right? If you go from having scheduled appointments with clients to asynchronous appointments with clients, it's like that gives you a tremendous increase in leverage in terms of how many people you need from deliverable perspective. If you change your sales motion so that a higher percentage people buy, uh, and so instead of needing 10 sales people, need two and they close the same amount because you've, you know, basically educated your prospects throughout the sales process more fully so they need less information to make decision, which means you have fewer conversations and shorter conversations for your sales reps and they talk to more qualified customers, then as a result you can take what used to take 10 people and you can funnel to two. None of that uses AI. This is my point is that there's so many places in a business where you can increase leverage that there's this fallacy that because I now have this infinite tool and I'll use infinite with quotes here. Um, I'm just seeing a lot of people using not making more money. That's kind of my point. And so it's this idea that we can throw away the fundamentals of business, but that's not true. Like you have to one is you want to use every form of leverage that you have at your disposal to solve the constraint of the business. If you don't know what the constraint of the business is, you just doing more automated does not make you more money. And I think this was the conversation that I was having because I'll tell you the the highest leverage thing that you can do, even higher leverage than AI. Ready for it? Making good decisions. Think about it. If I If I have my whole team and I say, "Hey guys, we're actually not going to do this whole bunch of work over here because I don't think it's important anymore." By doing that, I get so much more out of my team. Like, I think it is more efficient for me to determine that something is not a priority than for me to automate something that is not a priority. That was good. That was pretty good. That is higher leverage. And so, I will get more out um of this resource that I have, my team, than if I just try and automate it and then create an output that is irrelevant. And so, this is what I'm saying. And so, I think um quality still matters. AI's not there for a lot of things. Um there's obviously use cases and we're, you know, I would say very early and very aggressive adopters of AI across the business. When I look at the business overall, the things that are growing are the things that have always grown in, right? We need to generate more demand, we need to convert a higher percentage of that demand, and we need to create um we need to deliver, you know, very high-quality stuff. And right now, AI can help, but it's like having like access to a lot of It's actually, you know, it's actually probably a really good analogy. A lot of It's almost like access to a lot of virtual assistants. Like, third-world virtual assistants. That's what In some ways right now, a lot of the use cases are like that. I'm not saying it's perfect analogy, but like there's a lot of throughlines there. Which is that's always been there. And to be fair, I think virtual assistants right now sometimes are even cheaper than the AI token usage. Um but that's always been there. And businesses have still competed that didn't have them or did have them, and it's still the same marketplace, and there's still high quality, and there's still people with good brands and there's still great offers and bad offers. Like if you have a terrible offer, then AI on the back end is not going to help you. Now, you could say, "Well, I'm going to use AI to improve my offer." Maybe. Maybe not. I don't know. Um and so, anyways, that is my that is my public service announcement, which is that AI, though it increases leverage, does not cancel other forms of leverage. Um and for most people, they're using it on things to be more distracted because they have more resources now. They are still making poor decisions about how to allocate those resources. And as a result, thing three, are not making more money just because they have AI. And so, I would ask yourself this question, which is "Has implementing AI in my business made me more money?" If it hasn't, then you were likely using it in the wrong place. Which means that you need to return to the thing that matters most, which is identifying your true constraint. And then forcing all of your very limited, and I say that for myself included, all businesses compared to the resources available in the world, every one of us has in like a speck of resources available to us. And so, we have that tiny speck and our ability to focus that tiny speck of resource on the one thing that's going to move the needle, our skill at being able to do that is the thing that will ultimately make you more money, even more than AI. AI is just a tool. It's not the answer. So, anyways, that is my that is my two cents for the day. I hope you uh I hope you like my very impromptu style. If you hate it, you can let me know, too. Anyways, lots of luck. If you like this video and you're business owner who wants to break through your current revenue ceiling, I just filled every lesson from scaling 10 businesses past 10 million and three businesses past 100 million into a completely free scaling road map that I've used to go from zero to one, zero to 10, and zero to 100 plus. And so, you can click here and you can check it out. Again, absolutely free. And since you're a business owner, I appreciate you, and uh enjoy.

Weitere Posts von @alexhormozi

alle